How God Created the Universe Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 2

How God Created the Universe - Term Paper Example This paper analyzes the two stories using a comparative approach based on critical thinking, objective, reasoning, and reflective self-knowledge. Genesis chapter 1 gives a detailed account of how God created the universe â€Å"out of nothing† (John 36). I believe that the primary objective of the first account was to portray God as the most powerful being on earth as He had the potential to make wonderful things out of nothing. The Lord then arranged and made the universe habitable. On the first day, night, day, light, Earth and heavens were created. The sky was created on the second day while on the third day, God created plants, vegetation, and dry land. On the fourth day, God created heavenly bodies such as the stars and the moon. On the fifth day, God created birds and sea creatures while land creatures and man were created on the sixth day. On the seventh day, God took a rest (John 36). One questionable aspect of this creation account concerns the reasons why God decided to create things for six days; since He had the power of nature, He would have done all in one day. Deloria, however, argues that God wanted to r eveal is organized nature to the universe (34). The cycle is quite different and specific days are not mentioned in Genesis chapter 2. In the second creation story, heaven and earth were first created. Human beings were then created and a garden was set for man to tender and take care of. I think God wanted to create a garden that would provide a place for human existence. The garden is known as Eden and man was instructed not to eat from a tree that was at the center of the garden. The man was lonely, however, and God created birds and animals, which man was to name. God, however, noticed that man was still lonely and made him fall asleep and from his rib, He created a woman (John 37). The story of how sin came into following from the second creation story.

European Human Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

European Human Rights - Essay Example It also seeks to promote the rights of women and children, as well as of minorities and displaced persons. ‘Margin of appreciation’ is a doctrine that was first developed and applied in the case law of European Court and Commission of Human Rights. It is a concept developed by the European Union where different member states’ courts can interpret the Convention of Human Rights differently (Greer, 2000, p.5). The doctrine does not have universal litigation for all convention rights, since it has higher profile for some convention rights i.e. right to property; however, it has lower profile on other rights in the conventions. Moreover, there is no simple and clear method of describing how the doctrine works; further, the doctrine’s nature is that of uneven and unpredictable. Due to the nature of margin of appreciation, there is need for much structure, precision supervision and regularity in its application (Greer, 2000, p.5). The European Union formulated th e margin of appreciation since its member states comprise of diverse cultural and legal traditions embraced thus, it was difficult to identify uniform European standards of human rights. Moreover, the doctrine provides the flexibility needed to avoid damaging rows between the European Court, General, and the Member States. Additionally it permits the Court to balance the autonomy of Member States with their obligations under the Convention. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the contemporary practice of margin of appreciation in applying of Convention rights and freedoms. The paper will explore the logical flaws in the margin doctrine as currently conceived and the way they contribute in devaluing the convention. Moreover, the role of the Strasbourg Organ in the supervision of administering of the doctrine in its Member States is also discussed. Finally, an assessment of the efficiency and consistency of supervision is analyzed. Margin of appreciation The European Commission o f Human Rights endorsed margin of appreciation on the grounds that the national authorities are better placed to judge than the Strasbourg institutions. This doctrine is applicable in connection with articles of the convention providing some accommodations or limitation clauses. Some of the areas where Member States have been accorded margin of appreciation by the European Union convention on human rights are protection of morals, determining the mandate of the judiciary, prevention of crime and disorder and matters pertaining to national economy and security. In determining the scope of marginal of appreciation, the courts consider firstly, the subject matter of the protected right, i.e. a narrow margin is issued if the subject matter being protected is considered fundamental. Secondly, the aim and the interest of set restriction are also considered. Therefore, the margin of appreciation is determined by the effects of a restriction on other people in the society. Moreover, there a re European consensus standards, which are applicable to all Member States. In such cases, there is less need for application of margin of appreciation (Kleijkamp, 1999, p.50). However, there is concern in that uncontrolled margin of appreciation is devaluing the rights and freedoms provided by the Human Rights Convention. States that have the norm of human rights relativism can exploit this doctrine to cartel the exercise of human